|
Introduction In this issue ... |
· EQA Pilot
Scheme Funding: 2003 · Diary Dates · Christmas / New Year Holidays |
CPA NEEDS YOU
CPA Assessor Recruitment
|
CPA is undergoing a number of changes and we are also changing the way in which we recruit potential new assessors. Interested applicants are now invited to complete an application form taking into account the following person specification. Essential Criteria Assessors shall be: · employed at the most senior professional level within their own institution as a Medical Consultant, a Grade C Clinical Scientist, or a Biomedical Scientist (usually Grade 4 ). · a member, in good standing, of one of the professional shareholding bodies of CPA and endorsed as such. · supported by the Chief Executive and the Head of Department of their own institution. · working in a CPA accredited, or conditionally approved laboratory. · able to commit to at least 3 assessment visits per annum. · able to undertake all the necessary training and to attend the update sessions. Desirable Criteria Assessors should have: · wide knowledge of the functioning of a Medical Pathology laboratory. · an open–minded approach to assessment. |
· a commitment to the CPA standards of accreditation. |
GUIDANCE ON SUBSTANDARD
PERFORMANCE AND PARTICIPATION IN DIAGNOSTIC HISTOPATHOLOGY
AND CYTOPATHOLOGY EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT (EQA) SCHEMES. APRIL 2002
|
1. The definition of substandard performance published with the R C Path Bulletin in 1997 should remain in force; but large schemes such as the National Breast Screening and National Cervical Cytology schemes can and should adopt methods of analysis based on scores below a (per)centile such that participants scoring within the bottom 2.5% of an EQA round are identified. In practice this is what the Panel has agreed with these schemes. 2. If an EQA round has less than forty participants, the single participant with the bottom score is identified as a substandard performer. However before applying this criterion the Organiser and Participants meeting should consider whether such a score represents a meaningful deviation in standard. If there is more than one participant with the lowest score in the round no substandard performer is identified. |
3. The minimum acceptable level of participation in an EQA scheme is two rounds out of three consecutive rounds of the scheme calculated on a rolling basis providing the first action point has not been reached (see section 6 below). |
|
EQA PILOT SCHEME FUNDING: 2003
David Goldie, Chief Executive (EQA) |
|
DIARY DATES
CPA Annual Conference
2003 |
The CPA Office will be closed as follows: |